Seriously, fuck that dude

A few months back, I took Center for American Progress blogger Matt Yglesias to task for arguing that, because the U.S. economy was in recession, it was better to spend money blowing up poor Afghan civilians than not — you know, Keynesianism and the multiplier effect and all that economic jazz. After he surprisingly responded to be on Twitter, I apologized for calling him a “truly awful human being.”

I was much too kind.

In a post this morning, my favorite liberal foil provides definitive proof that he is either 1) an idiot, or 2) evil — though I suspect he may be both.

Take it away, asshole:

[W]ars undertaken for perfectly good reasons of collective self-defense can swiftly turn into situations that require post-conflict stabilization. North Korea might attack South Korea in a way that demands response, and the response could well lead to the collapse of the DPRK state requiring the victorious allies to administer former DPRK territory. So it’s not smart to just say “COIN is bad, so let’s make sure we can’t do it and then hope for the best.”

What we need, I think, is some form of American gendarmerie—a quasi-military federal organization specialized in police/security functions rather than finding and killing bad guys per se. Such a force would, unlike today’s military, have a valuable peacetime domestic role to play as a flexible auxiliary police force that could assist high-crime jurisdictions with the kind of temporary infusion of extra personnel that can help push crime rates down to a lower equilibrium.** A “surge” if you will. But it would also be prepared to deploy abroad in the case of contingencies. The regular military would be big enough to beat an adversary (i.e., a lot smaller than the regular one) but it would need to call on the gendarmes (who naturally would need a less French name) to conduct an occupation. This means we wouldn’t be caught lacking capacity in a real emergency, but since the gendarmes would be performing a useful peacetime domestic service politicians would (appropriately) feel that initiating situations that require their mobilization is high cost situation that ought to be avoided if possible.

I could go on at length at what is wrong with this suggestion — first, allow me to speculate that Mr. Matt, as a pasty white employee at an establishment liberal think tank (full disclosure: I’m pasty white too), hasn’t had much interaction with the quasi-military forces that already occupy American cities — but seriously, do I really need to? If you’re reading this blog, you probably don’t need a remedial class on progressive dumbfuckery.

Anyway, I think IOZ would (and, fingers crossed, will) do a better job.

(via Thoreau)

Advertisements

About Charles Davis

A writer and producer with whose work has aired on television and radio and been published by outlets such as Al Jazeera, The Intercept, The Nation and The New Republic.
This entry was posted in Liberalism, Matt Yglesias. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Seriously, fuck that dude

  1. Jack Crow says:

    He's arguing for a milice. It's a literal demand for a hybridization of police and military functions. In ole timey terms: a police state.This was also the guy who thinks there should be a king. You know, to keep the masses happy and shit.So yeah – fuck that fucking fucker.What was the Revolutionary Era French Doctor's name, again?

  2. Justin says:

    Its rather horrifying to consider. The other day I read about Miami gearing up to put unmanned aerial drones in the sky for surveillance. My question is, when exactly did Bladerunner become the platonic ideal for our society?

  3. A useful idiot, rather. After all, such an internal military force will be necessary when people finally wake up to what's been done to them by our corporate-military overlords.

  4. Justin says:

    Good God, I just went back and started reading the comments. There are plenty of people ripping him for his idiocy, but there is a shocking number of responses that are made in the scratching your chin and let's give this consideration it could work maybe, at least in theory, so we should put it into practice sophistry.Christ, one guy even suggested that the answer to being concerned about this occupying force bringing home what they learned from occupation and ignoring the bill of rights is to have them respect the bill of rights when occupying a foreign country. I think at this point I should just go for a long, quiet walk.

  5. dL says:

    Blackwater beat Yglesias to the idea several years ago.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s