As an outspoken supporter of the Iraq war — and of the earlier policy of starving hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children to death — Hillary Clinton is of course a widely respected figure in Washington when it comes to foreign policy. No doubt Clinton’s illustrious track record of advocating a belligerent though “humanitarian” militarism (once criticized by President-elect Obama in an earlier, forgotten time) was a key factor in her winning a glowing endorsement to be the next secretary of state from a fellow war criminal who once occupied the office:
Nov. 16 (Bloomberg) — Henry Kissinger said Hillary Clinton, frontrunner to be the next U.S. Secretary of State, would be an “outstanding” appointment to the post.
New York Senator Clinton appears to be President-elect Barack Obama’s leading choice for secretary of state, according to a Democrat familiar with the matter.
“She is a lady of great intelligence, demonstrated enormous determination and would be an outstanding appointment,” Kissinger, who served as secretary of state from 1973 to 1977 under presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, told the World Economic Forum’s India Economic Summit in New Delhi today.
Having overseen the deaths of millions of innocent civilians in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, Kissinger — in a just world — would be considered, at best, a pariah whose endorsement would be more toxic than Al Qaeda’s. But in the United States, those who advocate and facilitate disastrous, illegal wars of aggression are considered well-respected statesmen, with critics of American exceptionalism excluded from respectable mainstream discourse.