The endorsement that speaks for itself

As an outspoken supporter of the Iraq war — and of the earlier policy of starving hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children to death — Hillary Clinton is of course a widely respected figure in Washington when it comes to foreign policy. No doubt Clinton’s illustrious track record of advocating a belligerent though “humanitarian” militarism (once criticized by President-elect Obama in an earlier, forgotten time) was a key factor in her winning a glowing endorsement to be the next secretary of state from a fellow war criminal who once occupied the office:

Nov. 16 (Bloomberg) — Henry Kissinger said Hillary Clinton, frontrunner to be the next U.S. Secretary of State, would be an “outstanding” appointment to the post.

New York Senator Clinton appears to be President-elect Barack Obama’s leading choice for secretary of state, according to a Democrat familiar with the matter.

“She is a lady of great intelligence, demonstrated enormous determination and would be an outstanding appointment,” Kissinger, who served as secretary of state from 1973 to 1977 under presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, told the World Economic Forum’s India Economic Summit in New Delhi today.

Having overseen the deaths of millions of innocent civilians in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, Kissinger — in a just world — would be considered, at best, a pariah whose endorsement would be more toxic than Al Qaeda’s. But in the United States, those who advocate and facilitate disastrous, illegal wars of aggression are considered well-respected statesmen, with critics of American exceptionalism excluded from respectable mainstream discourse.

Kissinger’s endorsement of Clinton should at least provide a clue to those self-described anti-war progressives expecting great things from the next president that — rather than great change — the incoming Obama administration will more often than not represent continuity, particularly with regard to foreign affairs.
As I like to point out to my Obama-adoring friends: any man who can win the endorsement of both Colin Powell and Code Pink is bound to disappoint one or the other. I’m guessing it won’t be Powell.

About Charles Davis

A writer and producer with whose work has aired on television and radio and been published by outlets such as Al Jazeera, The Intercept, The Nation and The New Republic.
This entry was posted in Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, War Crimes. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The endorsement that speaks for itself

  1. A kindred spirit! How did that happen??? I just found your blog. Great stuff. I’m adding it to my blog roll. I’m at

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s